Return to Homepage

The 4-Hour Work Week and Timothy Ferriss  

Go Back   The 4-Hour Work Week and Timothy Ferriss > Elimination: 80/20 Principle, Parkinson's Law, Low-Information Diet, Interrupting Interruption...

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-27-2009, 02:57 PM
kfillen kfillen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
Default Strategy for identifying the 20% big items

In his book, Tim says to identify the few items of key importance by "throwing it all up on the wall and seeing what sticks".

I was wondering if anyone had nailed this down to a science. What is the key strategy for identifying those 20% items currently contributing to 80% of the favorable or unfavorable results in anything.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-27-2009, 04:00 PM
officer_dibble officer_dibble is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 459
Default

The ratio is not always 80/20 but it is rarely equal eg 50% of your time/money = 50% of results. And results are not always immediate eg it might cost you a lot of time today - but the long term pay off can be well worth plodding away at it. Or they can be a bit intangible eg time spent going to lunch with someone in exchange for possible future influence.

First of all you have to start monitoring/measuring eg you might keep a diary to see where your time is going and what are the outcomes.

Next look for patterns and anomalies eg if it takes an hour to deal with a customer who is worth $1 to you - perhaps you need to think about "sacking" them.

You're really looking for the things to leap out at you.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2009, 05:00 PM
kfillen kfillen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
Default

From what I'm hearing it's mainly trial and error.

I have noticed just in the past week at my current job that simply keeping my mind on the lookout for these 20% items have dramatically increased my productivity, but it still could be much much better.

Anyone else given thought to this and have other suggestions?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-02-2009, 01:00 PM
liam75005 liam75005 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lille, France
Posts: 496
Send a message via MSN to liam75005 Send a message via Skype™ to liam75005
Default

I dont think there can be a real science behind that...

However if you want to start thinkin about it with some kind of tool, maybe you can fill up some kind of grid with :

Task List
For each task : amount of time taken
For each task : impact (+ or -). (assess it on a scale from 1 to 10 by example).

Then you would sort it by decreasing impact and compute a % of the total as an increasing sum, you can then see where the cut is in your causes.

Example :
Task A - 10 minutes - Impact 9
Task B - 1hr - Impact 3
Task C - 30 minutes - Impact 6
Task D - 20 minutes - Impact 5
Task E - 2 hours - Impact 4

Sort by decreasing Impact
A - 9
C - 6
D - 5
E - 4
B - 3

Total = 27

Cumulative % :
A - 33% (9/27)
A+C - 55% (15/27)
A+C+D - 74% (20/27)
A+C+D+E - 89% (24/27)
A+C+D+E+B - 100% (27/27)

Your 80% impact is somewhere between A+C+D and A+C+D+E. That means that out of your 5 tasks , with 3 of them you have 74% of your impact. In time this represents 1hr out of 3 (total time for all tasks) which is 33%. In this case you don't have 20/80 but 33/74, but that makes it that to achieve 74% of your impact you only have to work 1hr instead of 3.

I hope it makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-02-2009, 08:11 PM
kfillen kfillen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 6
Default

This is very interesting Liam. I might look into doing something like that. Thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.